y ? Normal. Pero es grabacion.
Hace poco lei esto de otro de los que se rodearon de mucha chacharreria:
QUESTION: What do you think about the technical evolution of the synthesizer?
VANGELIS: The biggest problem is makers of synthesizers aren't musicians. The instruments are approached incorrectly. Alright, there's an enormous library of information, but you can't play the instruments, they hinder the spontaneous creativity. You buy a synthesizer and six months later, it's out of fashion. Then, a new one will appear which won't resemble the previous one at all. One should be working in the direction of a simpler, more human model. I don't want to lose time by reading every manual. What's the point of having a violin sound when you can't express yourself with it (no dynamics, vibrato, etc). They can implement all these things, but they prefer making instruments for the amateurs, the masses. When the CS-80 was released, I was euphoric; at last an instrument that responded, one with which you could communicate. Since then, no real instrument has been released over the world. The computer, instead of helping us, enforces it's way of thinking on me, and that's very dangerous. That's why I haven't bought such a machine ...
[Interview in the Nemo Studios by Carl Deseyn, "De Wending" February, 1990. Translated from Dutch by Piet Verhoeven]
Y un CS-80 es basicamente una maquina muy de preset, pero mucho. Sus voces, a nivel de sintesis son poco modificables.
pero miraros este video:
http://www.arturia.net/samples/videos/vtmahm.mpeg 
