Que haríais para evitar la piratería...?

mr_bluejay escribió:

Antes de exigir que el público pague por tu album tienes que tener un público, y para eso tienes que invertir y jugártela... o haces eso, o sacas tu trabajo a la venta sin haberte creado una base de fans y te hundes.

Cory Doctorow escribió:

When radio and records were invented, they were pretty bad news for the performers of the day. Live performance demanded charisma, the ability to really put on a magnetic show in front of a crowd. It didn't matter how technically accomplished you were: if you stood like a statue on stage, no one wanted to see you do your thing. On the other hand, you succeeded as a mediocre player, provided you attacked your performance with a lot of brio.

Radio was clearly good news for musicians — lots more musicians were able to make lots more music, reaching lots more people and making lots more money. It turned performance into an industry, which is what happens when you add technology to art. But it was terrible news for charismatics. It put them out on the street, stuck them with flipping burgers and driving taxis. They knew it, too. Performers lobbied to have the Marconi radio banned, to send Marconi back to the drawing board, charged with inventing a radio they could charge admission to. "We're charismatics, we do something as old and holy as the first story told before the first fire in the first cave. What right have you to insist that we should become mere clerks, working in an obscure back-room, leaving you to commune with our audiences on our behalf?"

Technology giveth and technology taketh away. Seventy years later, Napster showed us that, as William Gibson noted, "We may be at the end of the brief period during which it is possible to charge for recorded music." Surely we're at the end of the period where it's possible to exclude those who don't wish to pay. Every song released can be downloaded gratis from a peer-to-peer network (and will shortly get easier to download, as hard-drive price/performance curves take us to a place where all the music ever recorded will fit on a disposable pocket-drive that you can just walk over to a friend's place and copy).

But have no fear: the Internet makes it possible for recording artists to reach a wider audience than ever dreamt of before. Your potential fans may be spread in a thin, even coat over the world, in a configuration that could never be cost-effective to reach with traditional marketing. But the Internet's ability to lower the costs for artists to reach their audiences and for audiences to find artists suddenly renders possible more variety in music than ever before.

Those artists can use the Internet to bring people back to the live performances that characterized the heyday of Vaudeville. Use your recordings — which you can't control — to drive admissions to your performances, which you can control. It's a model that's worked great for jam bands like the Grateful Dead and Phish. It's also a model that won't work for many of today's artists; 70 years of evolutionary pressure has selected for artists who are more virtuoso than charismatic, artists optimized for recording-based income instead of performance-based income. "How dare you tell us that we are to be trained monkeys, capering on a stage for your amusement? We're not charismatics, we're white-collar workers. We commune with our muses behind closed doors and deliver up our work product when it's done, through plastic, laser-etched discs. You have no right to demand that we convert to a live-performance economy."

Technology giveth and technology taketh away.

Eduardoc escribió:

la SGAE y el canon es un dinero que es robado y administrado por cuatro ladrones corruptos, hay que olvidarse de esto....

Alguien escribió:

yo no lo veo tan claro

malonman escribió:

Eso es asi...pero por eso hay que aceptarlo?...todo lo que esta pasando al pais hay que hacer borron y cuenta nueva?...ya se que "encriptar" algo es bastante para que alguien consiga desacerlo...pero ¿ no hacer nada?

malonman escribió:

...sabeis cuanta gente esta parada por la mierda de que la "industria discografica" va mal?....mas de casi 500.000 personitas...que han estudiado, hecho su vida, ilusionado y trabajado duro para sacar sus "ideas" musicales...porque tienen que ser diferentes con la pintura o con un libro?...tengo derecho al ! pataleo !! y lo hago....

malonman escribió:

...Y si no te conocen

malonman escribió:

como haces esos conciertos,etc,etc...??

malonman escribió:

Por esta regla de tres...quienes quieran que sea esos...hagan en sus discos "ruido" ya se merecen que les compren?

mr_bluejay escribió:

Veo más sensato dejar TODO tu album/mixtape en descarga gratuita para todos, y que si tu como consumidor quieres un plus más y pagar por un formato físico lo puedas hacer (con tiradas limitadas de un disco, por ejemplo) pero sinceramente, en pleno siglo XXI es una gilipollez querer justificar la venta de discos como hace 40-50 años.

malonman escribió:

no entiendo lo de 10K ¿ son miles de €?

mr_bluejay escribió:

Caché de varios artistas (en dólares)

malonman escribió:

.o sea David Ghetta o su "gran equipo" para que lo sepais 180.000€/bolo...es porque regalo su "musica"?....mmmmmmm....lo dudo

mr_bluejay escribió:

De todos los artistas que salen en la lista he querido destacar a varios artistas que personalmente sigo, y que tengo más de una de sus mixtapes (hay varios que tienen mixtapes que le dan 1000 patadas a su album de estudio), se han ido labrando un nombre y ganándose un público con el paso del tiempo.

Antes de exigir que el público pague por tu album tienes que tener un público, y para eso tienes que invertir y jugártela... o haces eso, o sacas tu trabajo a la venta sin haberte creado una base de fans y te hundes.